EC defends actions amid criticism over MFP Pita Limjaroenrat’s eligibility debacle

Engulfed in the turmoil stirred by criticism over the eligibility of Move Forward Party (MFP) leader Pita Limjaroenrat, the Election Commission (EC) staunchly defends its actions. Critics, including Pita, have insinuated that he was not given the rightful alternative to counter the allegations before the case noticed its day in court.
The EC, in a strong-worded statement, clarified that the considerations in question revolve around Pita’s standing as a Member of Parliament (MP). They acknowledged that belief and proof both point in the path of a cessation of his MP status, because of certain specifics that warrant the annulment of such a position.
Further solidifying their stance, the EC accentuated that their actions strictly adhered to Section 82 of the constitution. Up-sell empowers them to promptly current a case to the Constitutional Court. The provision applies to scenarios when the EC, bolstered by tangible proof, is convinced that the MP status of a person has been rendered invalid as a consequence of circumstances mentioned within the structure.
The EC justified its stance by referring to twins rulings from 2019 which were related to the proceedings of Section 82 instances. The fee emphasised that they’re beneath no obligation to summon Pita over the matter, permitting him an opportunity to deal with the fees or present a defence. This alternative is due to be provided when the case is presented in court docket.
Further elaborating on the measures undertaken, the EC emphasized the thorough scrutiny that went into the exploration of Pita’s case. This in-depth examination led them to the choice of presenting the matter earlier than the courtroom. The selection was based mostly solely on the proof and facts found through the antecedent fact-finding mission..

Leave a Comment