Majority consider convicted criminals shouldn’t get a Royal pardon

In the wake of Minister of Justice Somsak Thepsuthin initiating a Royal pardon for many individuals convicted of corruption, drug trafficking, and different critical crimes, the National Institute of Development Administration polled 1,317 people and located overwhelming opposition to the proposed pardon.
The NIDA poll was done by phone between December 13 and December 15 and respondents from around the country represented folks of varied backgrounds and occupations. It asked whether or not an individual must be pardoned to obtain a lowered sentence if they have been convicted of various crimes together with corruption, drug trafficking, and more severe crimes like murder or rape.
The Justice Minister elevate ire in many people along with his proposed pardoning of a slew of convicted people that included former ministers, businessmen, and senior officers who had been previously convicted of corruption. The pardon would severely reduce the length of their prison time period.
In Factors , the vast majority of people had been in opposition to reduced sentences for any of the crimes, however much more so for crimes like murder or rape than corruption. Also, a majority (55%) imagine sentence reductions must be determined by a set of related parties like judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement companies, not just by a singular decision by the Corrections Department.
The respondents to the survey answered the next questions:
Should jail sentences be reduced for individuals who have been convicted of corruption?
Should prison sentences be lowered for people who were convicted of drug trafficking?
Should jail sentences be decreased for individuals who have been convicted of serious crimes like rape and murder?

Leave a Comment